[an error occurred while processing this directive]
low cloud effectsFrom Bjorn StevensDate February 26, 2007 Dear All, attached is our lowcloud effects white paper, adapted to reflect our decisions and discussions in Princeville. The changes from the previous version include an explicit reference to aerosol effects in our goal and an outline of the proposed tactics. Please look it over as I hope to post a final version by the end of the week. Bjorn cloud_effects.pdf From Kiran Alapaty Date February 26, 2007 Bjorn, thanks for sharing it. As you know, some of the science issues are very relevant to the ARM science program and I look forward for innovative proposals from the team (ARM RFP/solicitation is out and is available at grants.gov). Regarding white paper, here are my comments. Best, Kiran 1. My past research experience is that nonlocal mixing schemes (PBL) (e.g. Blackadar type) help the simulation of shallow convection better and possibly deep convection compared to K-schemes (for summer). Thus, it's worth testing such schemes in a GCM. For that my belief, I have recently developed a new closure formulation for Blackadar-type pbl schemes & tested it out for its performance. Works very well. Soon, I will implement it in the SCAM (1-D CAM). I believe that it will out-perform the existing pbl scheme in CAM and helps to improve shallow convection simulations. 2. Regarding conservative interpolation schemes, Piotr Smolarkiewicz at NCAR has done very good work on advection-equivalent interpolation (AEI) schemes (probably you may be aware of that work). I have published a small note comparing geometrical interpolation and AEI schemes (see http://ams.allenpress.com/archive/1520-0493/126/1/pdf/i1520-0493-126-1-2 43.pdf ) of course, i am talking about linear fields. 3. I am inclined to solicit development of a methodology that physically couples convective pbl, shallow, and/or deep convection processes. I am making myself a crude attempt to develop one such thing for GCMs. From Steve Ghan Date February 26, 2007 Bjorn: I wasn't able to attend the CMMAP meeting, so here I'd like to describe our plans because I think they fit in nicely with the goals of the low cloud CCMAP group. We are putting aerosol indirect effects into SAM and then the MMF, but we recognize that the present simulation of low clouds in the MMF is poor. So Vince Larson is putting his turbulence scheme into SAM. I believe he is testing it for DYCOMS-II first. His scheme is ideally suited to cloud-resolving models, because the time step requirements are comparable. We will then add droplet number to the microphysics, and use Vince's Latin hypercube technique to treat subgrid microphysics. This approach to aerosol indirect effects might not be as accurate as LES, but it will be much faster. Our plan is to use the MMF to estimate aerosol indirect effects (we have a separate plan for deep convective clouds). So please add Vince and me to your list of collaborators. -Steve Ghan |